Justification of nondestructive testing

Authors

  • Georgi Genov
  • Borislav Genov
  • Anton Antonov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46687/jsar.v1i1.22

Abstract

Progress in technology has enabled improvement in performance of materials and processes. These advancements lead to reduction in size and weight of engineering structures. But these structures become more sophisticated and expensive,and these lead to introduce quantitative nondestructive measures to ensure quality throughout all production process. This is particularly true for these applications, where the cost of the failure of a component can be unavoidable high compared to the cost of preventive measures, or the failure may cause catastrophic consequences. The following paper reviews present philosophy and justification of use of nondestructive testing (NDT).

References

ASTM “Nondestructive Testing”, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 2005

Deming, W. E., Quality, Productivity, and Competitive Position, MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study, Cambridge, MA, 1982.

ISO (1990). Quality Systems-Model for Quality Assurance in Design, Development, [4]Production, Installation, and Servicing. ISO/ANSI, New York.

ISO 9001:1994, Quality Systems — Model for Quality Assurance in Design, Development, Production, Installation, and Servicing, 1994.

ISO 9002:1994, Quality Systems — Model for Quality Assurance in Production, Installation, and Servicing, 1994.

ISO 9001:2000, Quality Management Systems — Requirements, 2000.

Lipson, C. and N. J. Sheth, Statistical Design and Analysis of Engineering Ex-periments, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1973. [9]Papadakis, E. P., Future Growth of Non-destructive Evaluation, IEEE Trans., SU- 23(5), 284–287, 1976.

Papadakis, E. P., Challenges and Op-portunities for Nondestructive Inspection Technology in the High-Volume Durable Goods Industry, Materials Evaluation,

(2), 1981.

Papadakis, E. P., Sampling Plans and 100% Nondestructive Testing Compared, Quality Progress, 1982

Papadakis, E. P., Stephan, C. H., McGinty, M. T., and Wall, W. B., Inspec-tion Decision Theory: Deming Inspection Criterion and Time-Adjusted Rate-of-Return Compared, Engineering Costs and Production Economics , Vol. 13, 111–124, 1988

Papadakis, E. P., Inspection Decisions Based on Costs Averted, Materials Evalua-tion, 50(6), 774–776, 1992.

Papadakis, E. P., Cost of Quality, Re-liability Magazine, January/February, 8–16, 1995

Papadakis, E. P., Quality, Productiv-ity, and Cash Flow, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA,1996.

Papadakis, E. P., A Cost of Quality: Three Financial Methods for Making In-spection Decisions, Materials Evaluation 55(12), 1997.

Walton, M., The Deming Management Method, Putnam Publishing Group, New York, 1986.

Downloads

Published

24.02.2023

How to Cite

Genov, G., Genov, B., & Antonov, A. (2023). Justification of nondestructive testing. JOURNAL SCIENTIFIC AND APPLIED RESEARCH, 1(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.46687/jsar.v1i1.22

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2012): Journal Scientific and Applied Research

Section

Technical Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2023 JOURNAL SCIENTIFIC AND APPLIED RESEARCH

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>