DISINFORMATION AS A SOCIAL THREAT TO NATIONAL SECURITY (IN THE CONTEXT OF THE RUSSIAN-UKRAINIAN WAR)
DISINFORMATION AS A SOCIAL THREAT TO NATIONAL SECURITY (IN THE CONTEXT OF THE RUSSIAN-UKRAINIAN WAR)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46687/jsar.v31i1.496Keywords:
Disinformation, Information warfare, National securityAbstract
The article examines disinformation as an essential social factor influencing national security in the modern world. In the context of digitalization and rapid dissemination of information, disinformation is becoming a powerful tool for influencing public attitudes, trust in institutions and the stability of the state.
The article analyzes the main characteristics and mechanisms of disinformation, as well as its social, political and psychological effects. The relationship between disinformation and the processes of public polarization, reducing trust in state institutions and creating a sense of insecurity among citizens is examined.
Special emphasis is placed on the manifestations of disinformation in the context of the Russia-Ukraine war, where information warfare plays a key role alongside traditional military operations. It analyzes how different countries use media and digital platforms to spread propaganda narratives and influence the international and domestic public environment.
References
European Parliament and Council. Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market for Digital Services (Digital Services Act).
European Commission. The 2022 Strengthened Code of Practice on Disinformation. Brussels, 2022. The Code is integrated into the DSA framework as a Code of Practice on Disinformation in 2025.
European External Action Service (EEAS). Report on FIMI Threats – March 2026. Brussels, 2026.
European External Action Service (EEAS). 2025 Report on EEAS Activities to Counter Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference (FIMI). Brussels, 2026.
European Union. EUvsDisinfo Database. Brussels: European External Action Service.
UNESCO. Journalism, Fake News & Disinformation: Handbook for Journalism Education and Training. Paris: UNESCO, 2018.
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policy Making. Council of Europe, DGI(2017)09. Strasbourg, 2017.
Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The Disinformation Order: Disruptive Communication and the Decline of Democratic Institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122–139. DOI: 10.1177/0267323118760317.
Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “Fake News”: A Typology of Scholarly Definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153.
Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., Schudson, M., Sloman, S. A., Sunstein, C. R., Thorson, E. A., Watts, D. J., & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The Science of Fake News. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096.
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236.
Bennett, W. L., & Pfetsch, B. (2018). Rethinking Political Communication in a Time of Disrupted Public Spheres. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 243–253.
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The Spread of True and False News Online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151.
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106–131.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. A Strengthened EU Code of Practice on Disinformation. Brussels: European Commission.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JOURNAL SCIENTIFIC AND APPLIED RESEARCH

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3668-6713