TOWARD A CONCEPT OF LOGISTICS ERGONOMICS: HUMAN FACTORS IN INTELLIGENT WAREHOUSE SYSTEMS: TOWARD A CONCEPT OF LOGISTICS ERGONOMICS: HUMAN FACTORS IN INTELLIGENT WAREHOUSE SYSTEMS

Yordanka Yankova-Yordanova

doi:10.46687/jsar.v31i1.513

Authors

Yordanka Yankova-Yordanova Department of Engineering Logistics, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Konstantin Preslavsky University of Shumen, Shumen 9712, 115 Universitetska St., e-mail: j.jordanova@shu.bg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46687/jsar.v31i1.513

Keywords:

Logistics ergonomics, Engineering logistics, Warehouse operations, Human factors, Cognitive workload, Physical workload, Smart warehouse, Ergonomic risk

Abstract

Digitalisation and automation have transformed warehouse operations, but they have not removed the human operator from the logistics system. Instead, warehouse work increasingly combines physical handling with digital instructions, time pressure, exception management and interaction with intelligent technologies. This conceptual paper develops logistics ergonomics as an engineering-logistics perspective that considers physical workload, cognitive workload, the technological environment, work organisation and logistics performance within a single analytical frame. The study synthesises established ergonomic methods and recent warehouse research and proposes a preliminary Logistics-Ergonomics Risk Indicator (LERI), implemented as a four-domain screening profile for identifying operations that warrant deeper ergonomic assessment. LERI is not presented as a validated risk scale and is not intended to replace RULA, REBA, NASA-TLX, the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation or other specialised methods. The framework is intended to connect human-factor analysis with warehouse design and operational decision making and to provide a basis for subsequent expert validation and empirical testing.

Author Biography

Yordanka Yankova-Yordanova, Department of Engineering Logistics, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Konstantin Preslavsky University of Shumen, Shumen 9712, 115 Universitetska St., e-mail: j.jordanova@shu.bg

Department of Engineering Logistics, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Konstantin Preslavsky University of Shumen, Shumen 9712, 115 Universitetska St., e-mail: j.jordanova@shu.bg

References

International Ergonomics Association. What is ergonomics (HFE)? International Ergonomics Association.

Nasir, D., Venkitasubramony, R., & Jakhar, S. K. (2025). Ergonomics in warehouse design and operations: A systematic literature review. Operational Research, 25(1), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-024-00892-z.

Loske, D., Klumpp, M., Keil, M., & Neukirchen, T. (2021). Logistics work, ergonomics and social sustainability: Empirical musculoskeletal system strain assessment in retail intralogistics. Logistics, 5(4), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics5040089.

McAtamney, L., & Corlett, E. N. (1993). RULA: A survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Applied Ergonomics, 24(2), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(93)90080-S.

Hignett, S., & McAtamney, L. (2000). Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA). Applied Ergonomics, 31(2), 201–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(99)00039-3.

Waters, T. R., Putz-Anderson, V., Garg, A., & Fine, L. J. (1994). Applications Manual for the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 94-110.

Kretschmer, V., Eichler, A., Rinkenauer, G., & Spee, D. (2017). Focus on the human being: Cognitive ergonomics in intralogistics. Logistics Journal: Proceedings, 2017(13). https://doi.org/10.2195/lj_Proc_kretschmer_en_201710_01.

Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX: Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human Mental Workload (pp. 139–183). North-Holland.

International Organization for Standardization. (2016). ISO 6385:2016 Ergonomics principles in the design of work systems. ISO.

TOWARD A CONCEPT OF LOGISTICS ERGONOMICS: HUMAN FACTORS IN INTELLIGENT WAREHOUSE SYSTEMS